What We Believe About The Incarnation

In the next two sessions we will deal with the two most central doctrines of our faith regarding Christ’s salvation which He makes possible for the human race. In this session we will speak of the doctrine of the incarnation. In the next we will address the doctrine of redemption.

I believe in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible; And in one Lord, Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the Only-begotten, Begotten of the Father before all worlds, Light of Light, Very God of Very God, Begotten, not made, of one essence with the Father, by whom all things were made: Who for us men and for our salvation came down from heaven, and was incarnate of the Holy Spirit and the Virgin Mary, and was made man; And was crucified also for us under Pontius Pilate and suffered and was buried; And the third day He arose again, according to the Scriptures; And ascended into heaven, and sitteth at the right hand of the Father; And He shall come again with glory to judge the living and the dead, Whose kingdom shall have no end. And I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord and Giver of Life, Who proceedeth from the Father, Who with the Father and the Son together is worshipped and glorified, who spake by the prophets; And I believe in one Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church. I acknowledge one Baptism for the remission of sins. I look for the resurrection of the dead, and the life of the world to come. Amen.

The eternal Son of God crossed the threshold of time and history and entered into human history. Everything that God did to reveal Himself in the Old Testament was to lead up to the entrance of God Himself into the world. "For us men," is used in its most traditional sense in the English language, referring to the whole human race. "And for our salvation" - everything that is done by the Word of God entering into our time is done because of His desire to save us. Simple repentance on man's part does not reverse the catastrophe that took place as the result of the fall. Man, who was created by God to share His immortality, was imprisoned in death.

St. Athanasius, the great defender of the divinity of Christ against the Arian heresy, wrote a brief book entitled, On the Incarnation. Tonight we will quote from it extensively. The word incarnation, from the Latin, means God taking flesh. No one has done a better job of answering the question, ‘Why did God become man?" Why was it necessary for God to do such a radical, incomprehensible thing - for the Creator to enter into His creation?

St. Athanasius says this.

God is good – or rather, of all goodness He is the fountainhead, and it is impossible for one who is good to be mean or grudging about anything. Grudging existence to none, therefore, He made all things out of nothing through His own Word, our Lord Jesus Christ; and of all these His earthly creatures He reserved especial mercy for the race of men. Upon them, therefore, upon men who, as animals, were essentially impermanent, He bestowed a grace which other creatures lacked – namely, the impress of His own Image, a share in the reasonable being of the very Word Himself, So that reflecting Him and themselves becoming reasonable and expressing the mind of God even as He does, though in limited degree, they might continue forever in the blessed and only true life of the saints in paradise…..

He set them in His own paradise, and laid upon them a single prohibition. If they guarded the grace and retained the loveliness of their original innocence, then the life of paradise should be theirs, without sorrow, pain or care, and after it the assurance of immortality in heaven. But if they went astray and became vile, …..

When man falls away from God he becomes uniquely vile. Just as it is God’s will for man to share the beauty of divinity, if he chooses the opposite he becomes very, very ugly and vile. Rather than like the beasts, fallen man becomes more like the devils – ugly, twisted, and vile.

….. throwing away the their birthright of beauty, then they would come under the natural law of death and live no longer in paradise, but, dying outside of it, continue in death and in corruption. This is what Holy Scripture tells us, proclaiming the command of God, "Of every tree that is in the garden thou shalt surely eat, but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil ye shall not eat, but in the day that ye do eat, ye shall surely die," (Gen 2:16f). Ye shall surely die - not just die only, but remain in the state of death and of corruption.

Death is not simply the moment of physical death. It is a state of being in which the human race becomes imprisoned and their destiny becomes frustrated and impossible to attain. And so, they are captives of the fear of death.

For God had made man thus (that is, as an embodied spirit), and had willed that he should remain in incorruption. But men, having turned from the contemplation of God to evil of their own devising …..

Notice that Athanasius doesn’t simply say we turn from God. Rather, we turn from the contemplation of God, from the remembrance of God, from the awareness of God’s presence. That is what is expressed in the opening chapters of Genesis. Adam and Eve turn away from communion with God to something for themselves; do not remember God; fill their minds with something else besides God – some good that takes the place of God. This is the essence of sin - to sin is to forget God. The reason why the great saints, cooperating with the grace of God, are able to rise above sin is directly proportional to their continual remembrance of God.

….. had come inevitably under the law of death. Instead of remaining in the state in which God had created them, they were in process of being corrupted entirely, and death had them completely under its dominion. For the transgression of the commandment was making them turn back again according to their nature; and as they had at the beginning come into being out of non-existence, so were they now on the way to returning, through corruption, to non-existence again…..

This is a very significant statement. Often we have the idea that the immortality of the soul is something we have inherently within us. No, what immortality we have is dependent upon God who is immortal. If a man turns away from God and becomes vile he returns to the nothingness from which he came (he is not annihilated, but his existence apart from God becomes an empty nothingness).

The presence and the love of the Word had called them into being; inevitably, therefore when they lost the knowledge of God, they lost existence with it; …..

To exist is not simply to be. To exist is to be in communion with God.

….. for it is God alone who exists, evil is non-being, the negation and antithesis of good. By nature of course, man is mortal, since he was made from nothing; but he bears also the Likeness of Him Who is, and if he preserves that likeness through constant contemplation, then his nature is deprived of its power and he remains incorrupt. So is it affirmed in Wisdom: ‘The keeping of His laws is the assurance of incorruption," (Wisdom 6:18). And being incorrupt, he would henceforth be as God, as Holy Scripture says, "I have said, Ye are gods and sons of the Highest all of you: but ye die as men and fall as one of the princes," (Ps. 82:6f).

This, then, was the plight of men. God had not only made them out of nothing, but had also graciously bestowed upon them His own life by the grace of the Word. Then turning from eternal things to things corruptible, by counsel of the devil, they had become the cause of their own corruption in death; for, as I said before, though they were by nature subject to corruption, the grace of their union with the Word made them capable of escaping from the natural law, provided that they retained the beauty of innocence with which they were created. That is to say, the presence of the Word with them shielded them even from natural corruption, as also Wisdom says: "God created man for incorruption and as an image of His own eternity; but by envy of the devil death entered the world," (Wisdom 2:23 f). When this happened, man began to die, and corruption ran riot among them and held sway over them to an even more than natural degree, because it was the penalty of which God had forewarned them for transgressing the commandment. Indeed, they had in their sinning surpassed all limits; for having invented wickedness in the beginning and so involved themselves in death and corruption, they had gone on gradually from bad to worse, not stopping at any one kind of evil, but continually, as with insatiable appetite, devising new kinds of sins. Adulteries and thefts were everywhere, murder and rapine filled the earth, law was disregarded in corruption and injustice, all kinds of iniquities were perpetrated by all, both singly and in common. Cities were warring with cities, nations were rising against nations, and the whole earth was rent with factions and battles, while each strove to outdo the other in wickedness. Even crimes contrary to nature were not unknown …..

Man, who was created in God’s image and in his possession of reason reflected the very Word Himself, was disappearing …..

The imprisonment of the human race in death and corruption was causing man to disappear as man.

….. and the work of God was being undone. The law of death, which followed from the transgression, prevailed upon us, and from it there was no escape. The thing that was happening was in truth both monstrous and unfitting. It would, of course, have been unthinkable that God should go back on His word and that man, having transgressed, should not die; but it was equally monstrous that beings which once shared the nature of the Word should perish and turn back again into non-existence through corruption. It was unworthy of the goodness of God that creatures made by Him should be brought to nothing through the deceit wrought upon man through the devil; and it was supremely unfitting that the work of God in mankind should disappear, either through their own negligence or through the deceit of evil spirits. As, then the creatures whom He had created reasonable, like the Word, were in fact perishing, and such noble works were on the road to ruin, what then was God, being good, to do? Was He to let corruption and death have their way with them? In that case, what was the use of having made them in the beginning? Surely it would have been better never to have been created at all, having been created, to be neglected and perish: and, besides that, such indifference to the ruin of His own work before His very eyes would argue not goodness in God but limitation, and that far more than if he had never created men at all. It was impossible, therefore, that God should leave man to be carried off by corruption, because it would be unfitting and unworthy of Himself.

Yet, true though this is, it is not the whole matter. As we have already noted, it was unthinkable that God, the Father of Truth, should go back on His word regarding death in order to ensure our continued existence. He could not falsify Himself; what, then, was God to do? Was He to demand repentance from men for their transgression? You might say that was worthy of God, and argue further that, as through the Transgression they became subject to corruption, so through repentance they might return to incorruption again. But repentance would not guard the Divine consistency, for, if death did not hold dominion over men, God would still remain untrue. Nor does repentance recall men from what is according to their nature; all that it does is to make them cease from sinning. Had it been a case of a trespass only, and not of a subsequent corruption, repentance would have been well enough; but when once transgression had begun men came under the power of the corruption proper to their nature and were bereft of the grace which belonged to them as creatures in the Image of God. No, repentance could not meet the case. What – or rather Who was it that was needed for such grace and such recall as we required? Who, save the Word of God Himself, Who also in the beginning had made all things out of nothing? His part it was, and His alone, both to bring again the corruptible to incorruption and to maintain for the Father His consistency of character with all. For He alone, being Word of the Father and above all, was in consequence both above to recreate all, and worthy to suffer on behalf of all and to be an ambassador for all with the Father.

For this purpose, then, the incorporeal and incorruptible and immaterial Word of God entered our world. In one sense, indeed, He was not far from it before, for no part of creation had ever been without Him Who, while ever abiding in union with the Father, yet fills all things that are. But now He entered the world in a new way, stooping to our level in His love and Self-revealing to us. He saw the reasonable race, the race of men that, like Himself, expressed the Father’s mind, wasting out of existence, and death reigning over all in corruption. He saw that corruption held us all the closer, because it was the penalty for the Transgression; He saw, too, how unthinkable it would be for the law to be repealed before it was fulfilled. He saw how unseemly it was that the very things of which He Himself was the Artificer should be disappearing. He saw how the surpassing wickedness of men was mounting up against them; He saw also their universal liability to death. All of this He saw and, pitying our race, moved with compassion for our limitation, unable to endure that death should have the mastery, rather than that His creatures should perish and the work of His Father for us men come to nought, He took to Himself a body, a human body even as our own. Nor did He will to become embodied or merely to appear; had that been so, He could have revealed His divine majesty in some other and better way. No, he took our body, and not only so, but He took it directly from a spotless, stainless virgin, without the agency of human father – a pure body, untainted by intercourse with man. He, the Mighty One, the Artificer of all, Himself prepared this body in the virgin as a temple for Himself, and took it for his very own, as the instrument through which He was known and in which He dwelt. Thus, taking a body like our own, because all our bodies were liable to the corruption of death, He surrendered His body to death in place of all, and offered it to the Father. This He did out of sheer love for us, so that in His death all might die, and the law of death thereby be abolished because, when He had fulfilled in His body that for which it was appointed, it was thereafter voided of its power for men. This He did that He might turn again to incorruption men who had turned back to corruption, and make them alive through death by the appropriation of His body and by the grace of His resurrection. Thus He would make death to disappear from them as utterly as straw from fire.

Perhaps there are no better words in the history of the Church that answer the question, "Why does God enter human history personally?" What does it mean that for us men and for our salvation He came down from heaven and took flesh? From His divine life He enters into our human life.

In the doctrine of the incarnation we say that by the Holy Spirit and the Virgin Mary, He, the Word of God, became man. God entering the womb of the Virgin Mary takes place as a cooperative action between the Holy Spirit and the Virgin Mary – a perfect divine/human cooperation – the Finger (Holy Spirit) of God writing the Word of God on the tablet of the womb of the Virgin Mary.

Why is it necessary that Jesus be conceived and born of a virgin? There are two reasons. First of all, the One who becomes incarnate in the womb of Mary is a divine person – the Son of God. He has only One Father and he takes upon himself in the womb of Mary a human nature. In doing so, He does not become another person. Rather, He is one person with two natures, fully divine and fully human. So, Jesus is born of a virgin because He has only One Father, the divine Father. He does not have a human father because He is not two people.

Secondly, in the hymns of the church we sing of the Virgin Mary that, "Without defilement (corruption) she gave birth to God the Word." What is this "corruption?" First, let us say what it is not. This does not refer to natural human procreation - it is good, established by God. But like everything else it is fallen. In Psalms 50 we read, "Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity and in sin (Septuagint – sins) my mother conceived me." This does not refer to the act of procreation – it refers to every act of the fallen human being. There is no aspect of human life that remains untainted by the law of death that has come to hold sway over the human beings.

So in Christ’s unique conception and birth we have both a continuity and a discontinuity with the human race. One the one hand, Jesus takes upon Himself, in the womb of Mary, human nature – complete human existence, like any other man, our brother (except that He is sinless). On the other hand, there is a discontinuity with what has gone before – there is a new humanity that is being created. Christ is the One who will be the father of the world to come, the One who ushers in the new creation, Who is the new Adam, who reverses all of the results of the Fall. In this unique conception and birth we have the beginning of what is the unique life of Christ.

Christ took His human nature directly from her who is understood in the Church as being the best that the human race has ever produced. Even the Protestant poet Wordsworth spoke of the Virgin Mary as, "Our tainted nature’s greatest boast." Through the union that takes place there between the Holy Spirit and the Virgin Mary, He who is completely outside time begins His existence in history.

We must speak about the two doctrines in the Church regarding the Virgin Mary. She is: The Mother of God (Greek Theotokos - literally Bearer of God); and Ever Virgin.

The Mother of God

The child that is born of Mary is the divine Son of the Father – it is nobody else. It cannot be said that Mary is the mother of the human part of Jesus. A woman is not the mother of a nature. Mary did not carry around a human nature in her womb. Rather, she carried a Divine person who had assumed to Himself a human nature. You cannot chop Jesus up into a Divine part and a human part. In Jesus Christ the fullness of the Divine nature and the fullness of the human nature are united perfectly in the One person. The One who comes forth from the womb of Mary is God from all eternity become man.

Ever Virgin

It is the doctrine of the Church from the very beginning that Mary had only one child, Jesus Christ, and no others. She is virgin before and after the birth of Christ. The word in the Scripture that is used to denote those identified as brothers or sisters of the Lord is a word that can mean anything from blood brother to cousin [adelphos (ad-el-fos') a brother (literally or figuratively) near or remote; "a brother, or near kinsman"].

The one who is set aside for this unique entrance of the Word God into the human condition does not return to the normal level of human life – she remains set aside by God as His mother. For the most part even the Protestant reformers did not deny the doctrine of the ever virginity of Mary. Even arguably one of the most extreme of them, Ulrich Zwingli, continued to refer in his prayers to Mary as the ever virgin. Only in the last three or four centuries has there been any denial among Christians of the ever virginity of Mary. Anytime that such a suggestion was made in the early Church it was immediately denounced as not being part of the deposit of the faith, that which had been held from the beginning.

Often reference is made to the Gospel of John. "When Jesus therefore saw His mother, and the disciple whom He loved standing nearby, He said to His mother, ‘Woman, behold, your son!’ Then He said to the disciple, ‘Behold, your mother!’ And from that hour the disciple took her into his own household," (John 19:26-27). If there are other children of Mary to take care of her, why does Jesus on the cross give her away to the care of John?

The Seven Ecumenical Councils

The doctrinal decisions that were made in the Ecumenical Councils of the Church safeguard in various ways the fullness of the divinity and the fullness of the humanity of Christ.

1st Council - Nicea (325 A.D.)

The Creed and the expression that the Son is of one essence with the Father. Responds to the heretic Arius who taught that Christ was a creature, not fully God.

2nd Council – Constantinople (381 A.D.)

Ratifies the Nicene Creed. Light of Light, Very God of Very God, Begotten, not made, of one essence with the Father. Completes the response to Arianism.

3rd Council – Ephesus (431 A.D.)

Reaffirms that Mary is the Theotokos (God bearer). Responds to the heresy of Nestorius who taught that Mary was only the mother of the human part of Christ.

4th Council – Chalcedon (451 A.D.)

Christ is one person in two natures (fully God and fully man). "We, then, following the holy Fathers, all with one consent, teach men to confess one and the same Son, our Lord Jesus Christ, the same perfect in Godhead and also perfect in manhood; truly God and truly man, of a reasonable [rational] soul and body; consubstantial [co-essential] with the Father according to the Godhead, and consubstantial with us according to the Manhood; in all things like unto us, without sin; begotten before all ages of the Father according to the Godhead, and in these latter days, for us and for our salvation, born of the Virgin Mary, the Mother of God, according to the Manhood; one and the same Christ, Son, Lord, only begotten, to be acknowledged in two natures, inconfusedly, unchangeably, indivisibly, inseparably; the distinction of natures being by no means taken away by the union, but rather the property of each nature being preserved, and concurring in one Person and one Subsistence, not parted or divided into two persons, but one and the same Son, and only begotten, God the Word, the Lord Jesus Christ; as the prophets from the beginning [have declared] concerning Him, and the Lord Jesus Christ Himself has taught us, and the Creed of the holy Fathers has handed down to us."

If we do not have a Savior who is fully God and fully man we do not have a Savior at all.

5th Council – 2nd Constantinople (553 A.D.)

Reaffirms Chalcedon.

6th Council – 3rd Constantinople (680 A.D.)

Christ has two wills – fully divine and fully human - and we are saved through the obedience of His human will. St. Maximos the Confessor was the hero of the 6th Council. Subsequently his tongue and right hand were amputated and he was beaten to death.

7th Council – 2nd Nicea (787 A.D.)

Reaffirms that the holy icons, the visible images that are used in the Church, bear witness to the fact that in Christ God has become visible, Christ is not an idea, Christ is the Word of God taken flesh, entering into human visibility. It is a good thing to picture Him in the church.

You see then that all of the decisions of the councils uphold and safeguard this essential teaching of the fullness of the divinity and the fullness of the humanity of Christ. The One who enters into our condition to save us out of sheer love for us is the Eternal God and He becomes like us in every way (save sin). It’s impossible for us to "figure Him out," - He is a mystery, beyond comprehension. Christ is known in the Church by experience. We do not try to force Him into our own limited intellect, knowing that who He is, from where He comes, as the Eternal Son of God, always remains far beyond us.

The next time we’ll speak of the doctrine of the redemption – what this incarnate Son of God comes to accomplish for us.